<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dr. Rachel Yager &#187; Innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rachelyager.com/tag/innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rachelyager.com</link>
	<description>Future Technologies and Intelligent Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 23:39:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Innovation Index &#8211; Most Innovative Companies (cont&#8217;d 2)</title>
		<link>http://rachelyager.com/2008/04/24/innovation-index-most-innovative-companies-contd-2/</link>
		<comments>http://rachelyager.com/2008/04/24/innovation-index-most-innovative-companies-contd-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Yager</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelyager.com/2008/04/24/innovation-index-most-innovative-companies-contd-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[April is a favorite time to think about innovation&#8230; and it ain&#8217;t over yet.  
Two weeks ago, I gathered the Innovation Index &#8211; Most Innovative Companies.  I saw BusinessWeek just updated the 2008 list &#8211; The World&#8217;s Most Innovative Companies (read below). 
Not surprising, the consistent players in the top 10 are Apple, Google, and GE.  
The World&#8217;s Most Innovative Companies
Smart ideas for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>April is a favorite time to think about innovation&#8230; and it ain&#8217;t over yet.  <br />
Two weeks ago, I gathered the <a href="http://rachelyager.com/2008/04/10/innovation-index-top-companies-in-the-world/">Innovation Index &#8211; Most Innovative Companies</a>.  I saw BusinessWeek just updated the 2008 list &#8211; <a target="_blank" href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/08_17/b4081061866744.htm?chan=magazine+channel_special+report">The World&#8217;s Most Innovative Companies </a>(read below). <br />
Not surprising, the consistent players in the top 10 are <strong>Apple, Google, and GE</strong>.  </p>
<blockquote><p><strong>The World&#8217;s Most Innovative Companies<br />
</strong>Smart ideas for tough times: The 50 companies that make up our annual ranking nurture cultures that value creative people in good times and bad</p>
<p>1 APPLE<br />
2 GOOGLE<br />
3 TOYOTA MOTOR<br />
4 GENERAL ELECTRIC<br />
5 MICROSOFT<br />
6 TATA GROUP<br />
7 NINTENDO<br />
8 PROCTER &amp; GAMBLE<br />
9 SONY<br />
10 NOKIA<br />
11 AMAZON.COM<br />
12 IBM<br />
13 RESEARCH IN MOTION<br />
14 BMW<br />
15 HEWLETT-PACKARD<br />
16 HONDA MOTOR<br />
17 WALT DISNEY<br />
18 GENERAL MOTORS<br />
19 RELIANCE INDUSTRIES<br />
20 BOEING<br />
21 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP<br />
22 3M<br />
23 WAL-MART STORES<br />
24 TARGET<br />
25 FACEBOOK<br />
26 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS<br />
27 AT&amp;T<br />
28 VIRGIN GROUP<br />
29 AUDI<br />
30 MCDONALD&#8217;S<br />
31 DAIMLER<br />
32 STARBUCKS<br />
33 EBAY<br />
34 VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS<br />
35 CISCO SYSTEMS<br />
36 ING GROEP<br />
37 SINGAPORE AIRLINES<br />
38 SIEMENS<br />
39 COSTCO WHOLESALE<br />
40 HSBC<br />
41 BANK OF AMERICA<br />
42 EXXON MOBIL<br />
43 NEWS CORP.<br />
44 BP<br />
45 NIKE<br />
46 DELL<br />
47 VODAFONE GROUP<br />
48 INTEL<br />
49 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES<br />
50 AMERICAN EXPRESS</p></blockquote>
<!-- sphereit end --><span style="margin-bottom:40px; border-bottom:none;"><a class="iconsphere" title="Sphere: Related Content" onclick="return Sphere.Widget.search('http://rachelyager.com/2008/04/24/innovation-index-most-innovative-companies-contd-2/')" href="http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://rachelyager.com/2008/04/24/innovation-index-most-innovative-companies-contd-2/">Sphere: Related Content</a></span><br/><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rachelyager.com/2008/04/24/innovation-index-most-innovative-companies-contd-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Innovation DNA</title>
		<link>http://rachelyager.com/2008/04/10/googles-innovation-dna/</link>
		<comments>http://rachelyager.com/2008/04/10/googles-innovation-dna/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Yager</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelyager.com/2008/04/10/googles-innovation-dna/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google seems to be the top choice for measuring up when it comes to innovation. This April, a number of magazines analyze the makeup of Google and its success factors.  In the blogosphere, Google’s innovation recipe (written by consultaglobal.com) gave a great summary of Harvard Business Review&#8217;s article (Reverse engineering Google’s innovation machine), and FastCompany&#8217;s article (The Faces and voices of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Google seems to be the top choice for measuring up when it comes to innovation. This April, a number of magazines analyze the makeup of Google and its success factors.  In the blogosphere, <a rel="bookmark" target="_blank" href="http://consultaglobal.wordpress.com/2008/04/09/googles-innovation-recipe/">Google’s innovation recipe</a> (written by consultaglobal.com) gave a great summary of Harvard Business Review&#8217;s article (<a modo="false" target="_blank" href="http://harvardbusinessonline.hbsp.harvard.edu/b02/en/common/item_detail.jhtml?id=R0804C">Reverse engineering Google’s innovation machine</a>), and FastCompany&#8217;s article (<a modo="false" target="_blank" href="http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/123/google.html">The Faces and voices of the world’s most innovative company</a>). </p>
<p>I read with interest from Portfolio (<a target="_blank" href="http://www.portfolio.com/executives/features/2008/03/14/Google-CEO-Eric-Schmidt-Interview">Search Mission</a> by Russ Mitchell, April 2008 Issue) that Google founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page chose a CEO in 2001, Dr. Eric Schmidt, who had previously worked in <strong>Sun Microsystems</strong>.  While Yahoo, in the same year, chose a CEO who is a <strong>Hollywood insider</strong>. Since 2001, there are dramatic differences in the performance and culture of the 2 companies with Google&#8217;s $5.7B profit in 2007 dominating the online advertisement world, and Yahoo now fighting a hostile takeover from Microsoft.</p>
<p>Goolge CEO&#8217;s training and background surely lend itself to the Google&#8217;s innovation fabric. </p>
<p>Recently at a Video 2.0 Meetup meeting in NYC, I was impressed with <strong>Sun&#8217;s innovative spirit</strong>, they continue to be interesting and contributing to the open source community.  Google&#8217;s CEO must have grown up with good old-fashioned structured processes and methodologies.</p>
<p>In the face of hypes and trends, sound management practice counts.  Engineering best practice is the balancing act to disruptive product strategy and technology.</p>
<!-- sphereit end --><span style="margin-bottom:40px; border-bottom:none;"><a class="iconsphere" title="Sphere: Related Content" onclick="return Sphere.Widget.search('http://rachelyager.com/2008/04/10/googles-innovation-dna/')" href="http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://rachelyager.com/2008/04/10/googles-innovation-dna/">Sphere: Related Content</a></span><br/><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rachelyager.com/2008/04/10/googles-innovation-dna/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Innovation Index &#8211; Most Innovative Companies</title>
		<link>http://rachelyager.com/2008/04/10/innovation-index-top-companies-in-the-world/</link>
		<comments>http://rachelyager.com/2008/04/10/innovation-index-top-companies-in-the-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 19:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Yager</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rachelyager.com/2008/04/10/innovation-index-top-companies-in-the-world/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tracking the innovation index from:

FastCompany (2008 March)
Fortune (2008 March)
Wired (2007 March)
BusinessWeek (2007 March)

See all the lists below.  Google, Apple, and GE are consistently appearing in the top 10.
FastCompany&#8217;s innovation index:
1 GOOGLE
2 APPLE
3 FACEBOOK
4 GE
5 IDEO
6 NIKE
7 NOKIA
8 ALIBABA
9 AMAZON
10 NINTENDO
11 PROCTER &#38; GAMBLE
12 NEWS CORP.
13 AFFYMETRIX
14 DISNEY
15 SAMSUNG
16 METHOD
17 TARGET
18 HP
19 TESCO
20 AUSRA
21 TIMBERLAND
22 IBM
23 ARUP
24 ANOMALY
25 AUTODESK
26 HERMAN [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p>Tracking the innovation index from:</p>
<ul>
<li><a target="_blank" href="http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/123/the-worlds-most-innovative-companies.html">FastCompany</a> (2008 March)</li>
<li><a target="_blank" href="http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2008/fortune/0803/gallery.innovation.fortune/index.html">Fortune</a> (2008 March)</li>
<li><a target="_blank" href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/15.04/wired40_list.html">Wired</a> (2007 March)</li>
<li><a target="_blank" href="http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/feb2008/id2008027_367300.htm">BusinessWeek </a>(2007 March)</li>
</ul>
<p>See all the lists below.  <strong>Google, Apple, and GE </strong>are consistently appearing in the top 10.</p>
<p><strong>FastCompany&#8217;s innovation index:</strong><br />
1 GOOGLE<br />
2 APPLE<br />
3 FACEBOOK<br />
4 GE<br />
5 IDEO<br />
6 NIKE<br />
7 NOKIA<br />
8 ALIBABA<br />
9 AMAZON<br />
10 NINTENDO<br />
11 PROCTER &amp; GAMBLE<br />
12 NEWS CORP.<br />
13 AFFYMETRIX<br />
14 DISNEY<br />
15 SAMSUNG<br />
16 METHOD<br />
17 TARGET<br />
18 HP<br />
19 TESCO<br />
20 AUSRA<br />
21 TIMBERLAND<br />
22 IBM<br />
23 ARUP<br />
24 ANOMALY<br />
25 AUTODESK<br />
26 HERMAN MILLER<br />
27 REALNETWORKS<br />
28 LG ELECTRONICS<br />
29 BOEING<br />
30 OMNITURE<br />
31 IROBOT</p>
<p><strong>Fortune&#8217;s innovation index:</strong><br />
1 Apple<br />
2 Nike<br />
3 Medco Health Solutions<br />
4 Procter &amp; Gamble<br />
5 Herman Miller<br />
6 Walt Disney<br />
7 Fortune Brands<br />
8 Burlington Northern Santa Fe<br />
9 McDonald&#8217;s<br />
10 ProLogis<br />
11 Starbucks<br />
12 Knight<br />
13 Whole Foods Market<br />
14 BMW<br />
15 3M<br />
16 Genentech<br />
17 FedEx<br />
18 MGM Mirage<br />
19 Accenture<br />
20 American Express<br />
21 CarMax<br />
22 News Corp.<br />
23 YRC Worldwide<br />
24 St. Jude Medical<br />
25 Starwood Hotels &amp; Resorts</p>
<p><strong>Wired&#8217;s 2007 innovation index:</strong><br />
1 Google<br />
2 Apple<br />
3 Genentech<br />
4 Samsung<br />
5 News Corp.<br />
6 Nintendo<br />
7 Salesforce.com<br />
8 Cisco<br />
9 General Electric<br />
10 Nvidia<br />
11 Baidu<br />
12 Toyota<br />
13 SunPower<br />
14 Infosys<br />
15 Medtronic<br />
16 Level 3<br />
17 Exelon<br />
18 Netflix<br />
19 Verizon<br />
20 Electronic Arts<br />
21 Monsanto<br />
22 Garmin<br />
23 Amazon.com<br />
24 NTT DoCoMo<br />
25 EMC<br />
26 Intercontinental Exchange<br />
27 Comcast<br />
28 BP<br />
29 Disney<br />
30 Yahoo<br />
31 Boeing<br />
32 eBay<br />
33 Flextronics<br />
34 Corning<br />
35 Gen-Probe<br />
36 TSMC<br />
37 Lenovo<br />
38 IBM<br />
39 Intel<br />
40 Microsoft</p>
<p><strong>BusinessWeek&#8217;s innovation index:</strong></p>
<p>1 APPLE<br />
2 GOOGLE<br />
3 TOYOTA MOTOR<br />
4 GENERAL ELECTRIC<br />
5 MICROSOFT<br />
6 PROCTER &amp; GAMBLE<br />
7 3M<br />
8 WALT DISNEY CO.<br />
9 IBM<br />
10 SONY<br />
11 WAL-MART<br />
12 HONDA MOTOR<br />
13 NOKIA<br />
14 STARBUCKS<br />
15 TARGET<br />
16 BMW<br />
17 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS<br />
18 VIRGIN GROUP<br />
19 INTEL<br />
20 AMAZON.COM<br />
21 BOEING<br />
22 DELL<br />
23 GENENTECH<br />
24 EBAY<br />
25 CISCO SYSTEMS<br />
26 MOTOROLA<br />
27 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES<br />
28 IDEO<br />
28 IKEA<br />
30 DAIMLERCHRYSLER<br />
31 HEWLETT-PACKARD<br />
32 NIKE<br />
33 BP<br />
34 RESEARCH IN MOTION<br />
35 AT&amp;T<br />
36 CITIGROUP<br />
37 VERIZON<br />
38 ROYAL PHILIPS ELECTRONICS<br />
39 NINTENDO<br />
40 COSTCO WHOLESALE<br />
41 VOLKSWAGEN<br />
42 PFIZER<br />
43 BEST BUY<br />
44 JOHNSON &amp; JOHNSON<br />
45 AMGEN<br />
46 MERCK<br />
47 NEWS CORPORATION<br />
48 MCDONALD&#8217;S<br />
49 LG ELECTRONICS<br />
50 EXXONMOBIL</p>
<!-- sphereit end --><span style="margin-bottom:40px; border-bottom:none;"><a class="iconsphere" title="Sphere: Related Content" onclick="return Sphere.Widget.search('http://rachelyager.com/2008/04/10/innovation-index-top-companies-in-the-world/')" href="http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://rachelyager.com/2008/04/10/innovation-index-top-companies-in-the-world/">Sphere: Related Content</a></span><br/><br/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rachelyager.com/2008/04/10/innovation-index-top-companies-in-the-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
